The effect of many-body potential type and parameterisation on the accuracy of predicting mechanical properties of aluminium using molecular dynamics

S Subedi and LS Morrissey and SM Handrigan and S Nakhla, MOLECULAR SIMULATION, 46, 271-278 (2020).

DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2019.1697439

As opposed to traditional laboratory testing, Molecular Dynamics (MD) offers an atomistic scale method to estimate the mechanical properties of metals. However, there is limited literature that shows the effect of interatomic potentials when determining mechanical properties. Hence, the present research was conducted to investigate the accuracy of various interatomic potentials in estimating mechanical properties of aluminium. Several types of potentials, including Embedded Atom Method (EAM), Modified EAM (MEAM) and Reactive Force Field (ReaxFF) were compared with available experimental data for pure aluminium to determine the most accurate interatomic potential. A uniaxial tensile test was performed at room temperature using MD simulations for nanoscale aluminium. Results demonstrated that those potentials parameterised with elastic constants at physically realisable temperatures were consistently more accurate. Overall, the Mishin et al. EAM potential was the most accurate when compared to single-crystal experimental values. Regardless of the potential type, the error was significantly higher for those potentials that did not consider elastic constants during development. In brief, the application of the interatomic potentials to estimate mechanical properties of a nanoscale aluminium was investigated.

Return to Publications page